Ive been using darktable on the side for years now but why bother if i also pay for capture one. If it works for what i need i will use it and have no issue adapting, free is better. I use capture one as my primary convertor and digikam for a dam. It is for those that want a free open source backup solution should your paid for app go subscription. Lightroom also has better highlight reconstruction when one or two channels are clipped. What Lightroom has that I want in darktable is GainMap in OpcodeList3 because that corrects the lens shade from DJI Mavic. I find it very easy and the prints look like the paintings.ĭPP4 has no support for Linux or my Spydercheckr.Ĭapture One has no support for Linux and no lens profile for my: That is what I do when I edit photos of paintings. Why would you Darktable over the mainstream paid apps other than money?īase curve, crop, rotate and perspective, color calibration with Spydercheckr. So I am curious who is the typical Darktable user? These seem to be the most popular apps by the numbers. I know that many people on this forum use the Adobe apps, Capture 1 and ON 1. I have and use mostly paid apps, including Affinity Photo, Pixelmator Pro, Luminar Neo, and DxO Nik Collection. Is Darktable for people who only want free Open Source apps? I have tried it a couple of times and find it very complex.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |